<glossref>
Glossary reference topic references are a convenience element for creating references to
glossary topics. It has a required @keys attribute, which forces the author to
create a key by which inline terms can reflect the glossary terms and become navigable links to
the glossary definition. For example, when <glossentry> topics are used
to define acronyms, this reminds authors to create a key that
<abbreviated-form> elements can use to refer to the short and expanded
versions of the acronyms.
Usage information
Note that the key names defined in the@keys attribute do not need to match the target term or acronym. Using
more qualified values or distinct key scopes for the keys will reduce conflicts in situations
where the same key name might be associated with different terms. For example, an information
set could use cars.absas the key for the term Anti-lock Braking System, and
ship.absto refer to the term American Bureau of Shipping.
Specialization hierarchy
The <glossref> element is specialized from
<topicref>. It is defined in the glossary reference domain
module.
Attributes
The following attributes are available on this element: link-relationship attributes, universal
attributes, @chunk, @collection-type,
@keyref, @keys, @linking, @processing-role,
@search, and @toc.
- The
@hrefattribute is a reference to a glossary definition, typically a<glossentry>topic. - The
@keysattribute is required. - The
@linkingattribute has a default value of none. - The
@tocattribute has a default value of no. - The
@searchattribute has a default value of no.
The following attributes are available on this element: universal attributes and the attributes defined below.
@chunk(common map attributes)- Specifies how a processor should render a map or branch of a map. For example, it can be used to specify that individual topic
documents should be rendered as a single document, or that a single document with
multiple topics should be rendered as multiple documents.The following values are valid:
- combine
- Instructs a processor to combine the referenced source documents for rendering purposes. This is intended for cases where a publishing process normally results in a single output artifact for each source XML document.
- split
- Instructs a processor to split each topic from the referenced source document into its own document for rendering purposes. This is intended for cases where a publishing process normally results in a single output artifact for each source XML document, regardless of how many DITA topics exist within each source document.
Processors can also define custom, implementation-specific tokens for this attribute.
For a detailed description of the
@chunkattribute and its usage, see Chunking. @collection-type(common map attributes)- Specifies how topics or links relate to each other. The
processing default is unordered, although no
default is specified in the OASIS-provided grammar files. The
following values are valid:
- unordered
- Indicates that the order of the child topics is not significant.
- sequence
- Indicates that the order of the child topics is significant. Output processors will typically link between them in order.
- choice
- Indicates that one of the children should be selected.
- family
- Indicates a tight grouping in which each of the
referenced topics not only relates to the current topic
but also relate to each other. Draft comment: Kristen J Eberlein 28 September 2022
In the definitions of the supported values, do we want to refer to "resources" instead of "topics"? Since we specify that
@collection-typespecifies "how topics or links relate to each other" ...Draft comment: robanderTO RESOLVE 13 May 2026: Good point, no strong feeling, but we should be consistent here, we already use "topics", "child topics", "children", and "referenced topics". Maybe:- Start with "Specifies how child topic references or links within the current element relate to each other"? Since this applies to children and we only sort of say that in the definitions of the tokens
- When describing the tokens, maybe use "referenced resources", as in "Indicates that the order of the referenced resources is not significant"
@format(link-relationship attributes)- Specifies the format of the resource that is referenced. See TODO: Update link and title to OASIS published URI for detailed information on supported values and processing implications.
@href(link-relationship attributes)- Specifies a reference to a resource. See TODO: Update link and title to OASIS published URI for detailed information on supported values and processing implications.
@keyref- Specifies a key name that acts as a
redirectable reference based on a key definition within a map. See
TODO: Update link and title to OASIS published URI for information on using this
attribute.Draft comment: robanderThe definiton above for @keyref should be synchronized with the definition in the linked section on keys.Draft comment: robanderTO RESOLVE 13 May 2026: Check the topic we link to and make sure this is consistent, then remove the draft comment
@keys- Specifies one or more names for a resource. See TODO: Update link and title to OASIS published URI for information on using this attribute.
@linking(common map attributes)- Specifies linking characteristics of a topic specific to the location of this
reference in a map. If the value is not specified
locally, the value might cascade from another element in the map
(for cascade rules, see Cascading of metadata attributes in a DITA map).
The following values are valid:Draft comment: robander Dec 28 2021The text below matches 1.3 spec text but I'm nervous about "cannot link" type definition. It's describing how to generate links based on the current context in the map - it's not describing what the topic itself is allowed to link to, which is how I interpret "can".Draft comment: robanderTO RESOLVE 13 May 2026: Yeah we should remove the can/cannot and replace with a description of the intent here... like, targetonly "The topic or resource can be the target of any context based linking, but is not meant to be updated with links related to this context."
similarly, none could be "The topic or resource does not participate in any context-based linking"
- targetonly
- A topic can only be linked to and cannot link to other topics.
- sourceonly
- A topic cannot be linked to but can link to other topics.
- normal
- A topic can be linked to and can link to other topics. Use this to override the linking value of a parent topic.
- none
- A topic cannot be linked to or link to other topics.
- -dita-use-conref-target
- See Using the -dita-use-conref-target value for more information.
Draft comment: Kristen J Eberlein 28 September 2022Here is the content from the "DITA map attributes" topic:
@linking-
By default, the relationships between the topics that are referenced in a map are reciprocal:
- Child topics link to parent topics and vice versa.
- Next and previous topics in a sequence link to each other.
- Topics in a family link to their sibling topics.
- Topics referenced in the table cells of the same row in a relationship table link to each other. A topic referenced within a table cell does not (by default) link to other topics referenced in the same table cell.
This behavior can be modified by using the
@linkingattribute, which enables an author or information architect to specify how a topic participates in a relationship. The following values are valid:linking="none"- Specifies that the topic does not exist in the map for the purposes of calculating links.
linking="sourceonly"- Specifies that the topic will link to its related topics but not vice versa.
linking="targetonly"- Specifies that the related topics will link to it but not vice versa.
linking="normal"- Default value. It specifies that linking will be reciprocal (the topic will link to related topics, and they will link back to it).
Authors also can create links directly in a topic by using the
<xref>or<link>elements, but in most cases map-based linking is preferable, because links in topics create dependencies between topics that can hinder reuse.Note that while the relationships between the topics that are referenced in a map are reciprocal, the relationships merely imply reciprocal links in generated output that includes links. The rendered navigation links are a function of the presentation style that is determined by the processor.
Draft comment: robanderTO RESOLVE 13 May 2026: Ensure there is nothing conflicting, and add a link from here to the more architectural info that gives all the details @processing-role(common map attributes)- Specifies whether the referenced resource is processed
normally or treated as a resource that is only included in order to resolve references,
such as key or content references. The following values are valid:
- normal
- Indicates that the resource is a readable part of the information set. It is
included in navigation and search results. This is the default value for the
<topicref>element. - resource-only
- Indicates that the resource should be used only for processing purposes. It is
not included in navigation or search results, nor is it rendered as a topic. This
is the default value for the
<keydef>element.
- -dita-use-conref-target
- See Using the -dita-use-conref-target value for more information.
If no value is specified but the attribute is specified on a containing element within a map or within the related-links section, the value cascades from the closest containing element.
@scope(link-relationship attributes)- Specifies the closeness of the relationship between the
current document and the referenced resource. The following values are valid:
local, peer,
external, and
-dita-use-conref-target.
See TODO: Update link and title to OASIS published URI for detailed information on supported values and processing implications.
@search(common map attributes)- Specifies whether the target is available for searching. If the value is not specified
locally, the value might cascade from another element in the map
(for cascade rules, see Cascading of metadata attributes in a DITA map). The following values are valid:
yes, no, and
-dita-use-conref-target.Draft comment: Kristen J Eberlein 28 September 2022
Here is the content from the "DITA map attributes" topic:
@search- Specifies whether the topic is included in search indexes.
Draft comment: robanderTO RESOLVE 13 May 2026: Update to use the same description, these are very similar but not exact. If the description is this short and similar it should be reused with conref. @toc(common map attributes)- Specifies whether a topic appears in the table of contents (TOC) based on the current
map context. If the value is not specified
locally, the value might cascade from another element in the map
(for cascade rules, see Cascading of metadata attributes in a DITA map). The following values are valid:
- yes
- The topic appears in a generated TOC.
- no
- The topic does not appear in a generated TOC.
- -dita-use-conref-target
- See TODO: Update link and title to OASIS published URI for more information.
Draft comment: Kristen J Eberlein 28 September 2022Here is the content from the "DITA map attributes" topic:
@toc- Specifies whether topics are excluded from navigation output, such as a Web
site map or an online table of contents. By default,
<topicref>hierarchies are included in navigation output; relationship tables are excluded.
Draft comment: robanderTO RESOLVE 13 May 2026: I read that and kind of hate "web site map". Kind of think we should delete that bit from the other topic, and replace the first sentence there with a reused sentence from here. @type(link-relationship attributes)- Describes the target of a reference. See TODO: Update link and title to OASIS published URI for detailed information on supported values and processing implications.
Example
This section is non-normative.
The following code sample demonstrates using a <glossref> element to
include a car-specific glossary entry in the map. The glossary reference has the key "abs".
The <glossref> element is within the key scope "cars", so references
to this glossary entry from outside the "cars" key scope will be of the form
<keyword keyref="cars.abs"/>.
<map>
<!-- ... -->
<topicref href="car-maintenance.dita"/>
<!-- ... -->
<topichead keyscope="cars">
<topicmeta><navtitle>Car Terminalogy</navtitle></topicmeta>
<glossref keys="abs" href="glossary/a/antiLockBrake.dita"/>
<!-- ... key declarations for other referenced acronyms ... -->
</topichead>
</map>
When this is map is rendered using typical output processing, the table of contents will
have an entry for the topic head "Car Terminology" but will not have entries for the
glossary entries because <glossref> sets the value of
@toc to no by default.
Here is the content from the "DITA map attributes" topic:
@collection-type@collection-typeattribute specifies how the children of a<topicref>element relate to their parent and to each other. This attribute, which is set on the parent element, typically is used by processors to determine how to generate navigation links in the rendered topics. For example, a@collection-typevalue of "sequence" indicates that children of the specifying<topicref>element represent an ordered sequence of topics; processors might add numbers to the list of child topics or generate next/previous links for online presentation. This attribute is available in topics on the<linklist>and<linkpool>elements, where it has the same behavior. Where the@collection-typeattribute is available on elements that cannot directly contain elements, the behavior of the attribute is undefined.